Skip to content
business-in-switzerland.com

AG vs GmbH

AG vs GmbH in Switzerland: which legal form to choose

The AG and the GmbH are the two limited-liability companies that foreign founders actually use in Switzerland. They are taxed the same way and both cap your risk at the money you put in, but they differ on capital, privacy, governance and prestige in ways that matter from day one.

AG vs GmbH in Switzerland: which legal form to choose

Written by Lukas Brunner · Reviewed by Marc Wyler

Last reviewed: July 2026

Almost every foreign-owned business in Switzerland is set up as one of two corporate forms: the AG (Aktiengesellschaft, société anonyme, the stock corporation governed by OR art. 620 ff) or the GmbH (Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung, Sàrl, the limited liability company governed by OR art. 772 ff). Both are separate legal persons, both limit the owners' liability to their contribution, and both are taxed as ordinary corporations, so the choice is rarely about tax. It is about capital, privacy, governance and how the entity reads to banks, investors and counterparties.

This guide sets the two forms side by side using the figures fixed in the Swiss Code of Obligations (Obligationenrecht, OR), then gives a short decision framework for founders coming from abroad. Where a number is statutory it does not change with the canton or the advisor, so you can plan around it with confidence. For the wider menu of Swiss legal forms, see our overview of all Swiss company types.

By the numbers

The figures that anchor this topic.

CHF 100k

AG min capital · OR art. 621

CHF 20k

GmbH capital, fully paid · OR art. 773

100%

Foreign ownership allowed

11.85%

Combined ETR, Zug · same for both

At a glance

Two limited-liability companies, taxed the same.

An AG (Aktiengesellschaft, SA in French) is a stock corporation under OR art. 620 ff. Its capital is split into shares, the shareholders are not named in the public register, and it is the form investors and large counterparties expect. A GmbH (Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung, Sàrl in French) is a limited liability company under OR art. 772 ff. Its capital is split into quotas, the members are listed publicly, and it is the lighter, lower-capital choice for owner-run businesses.

Both are capital companies with their own legal personality, both cap owner liability at the subscribed capital, and both are taxed identically as corporations. So the short verdict is this: choose a GmbH for the lower entry capital and a simple owner-run structure; choose an AG for owner anonymity, easier share transfer, prestige and outside investment. Tax does not break the tie. The sections below work through each axis, and the comparison block sets them all in one view.

Side by side

AG vs GmbH compared, point by point.

The two forms decompose along the same axes. Tax and audit rows are identical for both, so they are not differentiators; the rows that decide the choice are capital, privacy, transfer and prestige.

  • Governing articles. AG: OR art. 620 ff. GmbH: OR art. 772 ff.
  • Minimum capital. AG: CHF 100,000 (OR art. 621). GmbH: CHF 20,000 (OR art. 773).
  • Paid in at formation. AG: at least CHF 50,000 or 20%, whichever is higher (OR art. 632). GmbH: fully paid in (OR art. 777c).
  • Minimum nominal value. AG: CHF 0.01 per share (OR art. 622.4). GmbH: CHF 100 per quota (OR art. 774).
  • Owner instrument. AG: registered shares (Aktien). GmbH: quotas (Stammanteile).
  • Liability. Both: limited to the subscribed capital.
  • Owner privacy. AG: shareholders in a private share register, not published. GmbH: members listed by name in the commercial register and Zefix.
  • Governance bodies. AG: general meeting, board of directors, auditor. GmbH: members' meeting, managing officers, auditor.
  • Swiss-resident representative. AG: required (OR art. 718.4). GmbH: required (OR art. 814.3).
  • Ownership transfer. AG: shares assign freely and privately. GmbH: quota transfer in writing, published, members' consent by default.
  • Audit regime. Both: same OR art. 727 thresholds.
  • UBO disclosure. Both: beneficial owner of 25% or more reported to the company (OR art. 697j).
  • Taxation. Both: federal plus cantonal and communal corporate tax, same rates per canton.
  • International prestige. AG: higher. GmbH: simpler, reads as an SME.

Capital

Minimum capital and paying it in.

This is the headline split. An AG requires a minimum share capital of CHF 100,000 (OR art. 621). Of that, at least CHF 50,000, or 20 percent of the share capital where that is higher, must be paid in at formation (OR art. 632). The balance remains a callable obligation of the shareholders. A GmbH requires a minimum capital of CHF 20,000 (OR art. 773), and unlike the AG it must be fully paid in at formation (OR art. 777c), with a minimum quota of CHF 100 (OR art. 774). There is no partial-payment option.

In both cases the capital is deposited into a blocked consignment account at a Swiss bank and released once the company is entered in the commercial register. The 2023 corporate-law reform added flexibility competitors often miss: a share's minimum nominal value fell to CHF 0.01 (OR art. 622.4), capital may be denominated in a foreign currency where that is the company's most important currency (OR art. 621.2), and a capital band of plus or minus 50 percent over up to five years became available (OR art. 653s ff). To model the deposit and the figures for your case, you can estimate your capital requirement with our calculator.

AG vs GmbH in Switzerland: Minimum capital and paying it in.

Liability

Liability and ownership instruments.

Neither form exposes the owners to personal liability for the company's debts in normal operation. In an AG the shareholder risks only the subscription price of the shares; in a GmbH the member risks only the value of the quota. The company answers for its obligations with its own assets. The practical caveats are identical: directors and managing officers carry statutory duties of care and can be held personally liable for breaches, unpaid social-security contributions or trading while insolvent, and a bank lending to a young company will often ask the owner for a personal guarantee that contracts around the shield voluntarily.

The ownership instrument is where the forms part. The AG divides its capital into shares (Aktien), which assign by endorsement and entry in the share register, with no notary in an ordinary sale and no trace in the public register. The GmbH divides its capital into quotas (Stammanteile), each recorded by name in the commercial register together with the holding. A quota transfer must be in writing, is published, and by default needs the consent of the members' meeting. That friction can be a feature for a tight founder group, but it is a drag in a financing or exit.

Privacy

Privacy: who is publicly visible.

If owner privacy matters, the AG is the stronger form. Its shareholders are not published in the commercial register. The company keeps a share register internally, and a beneficial owner of 25 percent or more must be disclosed to the company under OR art. 697j, but that disclosure is internal, not public. Note the nuance: bearer shares were abolished in 2019 (OR art. 622.1bis), so AG anonymity means a private register rather than secrecy.

The GmbH publishes its members. Anyone searching the cantonal commercial register or the federal Zefix portal can see who owns the company and in what proportion, including the member's name, domicile and quota value, and that record updates whenever quotas change hands. For founders who do not want their name searchable as the owner of a Swiss operating company, this often decides the question in favour of the AG even where the higher capital is not otherwise needed.

Governance

Governance and company bodies.

An AG is run by a board of directors (Verwaltungsrat), which may be a single person, plus a general meeting of shareholders and an auditor where one is required. The board holds the non-transferable strategic duties set out in OR art. 716a. At least one person with signing authority must be resident in Switzerland (OR art. 718.4).

A GmbH is run by one or more managing officers (Geschäftsführer), plus a members' meeting and an auditor where required. By default every member has the right to participate in management, though the articles usually concentrate this in named officers. The same Swiss-residence requirement for a signing officer applies (OR art. 814.3). Governance in a GmbH is generally lighter and better suited to a small, closely held venture, while the AG's board structure scales more naturally as ownership widens.

Audit

Audit obligations are identical.

Audit is not a differentiator: both forms follow the same regime under the Code of Obligations. An ordinary audit applies where a company exceeds two of three thresholds in two consecutive years, namely a balance-sheet total of CHF 20 million, revenue of CHF 40 million and 250 full-time employees (OR art. 727). Below those thresholds a lighter limited review applies (OR art. 727a).

Smaller companies of either form can opt out of the audit entirely (the so-called Opting-out) where they have 10 or fewer full-time employees and all members or shareholders agree. Whether you register an AG or a GmbH does not change which tier you fall into; the size of the company does.

AG vs GmbH in Switzerland: Audit obligations are identical.

Tax

Taxation: identical treatment.

For tax purposes the AG and the GmbH are treated the same. Both are capital companies subject to federal corporate income tax (8.5 percent statutory, around 7.83 percent effective on a pre-tax basis) and to cantonal and communal corporate income and capital taxes, at the same rates for the same canton. Both fall under the same participation-exemption and withholding-tax rules on dividends. There is no tax advantage to either form.

What does move the rate is the canton of the seat, not the legal form. A company in low-tax Zug reaches a combined effective rate near 11.85 percent whether it is an AG or a GmbH, while a higher-tax canton charges both forms more. So the AG-versus-GmbH decision should be made on capital, privacy and governance, and the canton chosen separately for tax.

For foreigners

What changes for a foreign founder.

Both forms allow 100 percent foreign ownership. There is no nationality or residency requirement for the shareholders of an AG or the members of a GmbH, and no minimum local shareholding. The one binding constraint is the Swiss-resident representative: at least one director or officer with signing authority must be resident in Switzerland (OR art. 718.4 for the AG, OR art. 814.3 for the GmbH). Foreign founders without a Swiss resident on the team typically appoint a local resident director or managing officer to satisfy this.

Two further points apply to both forms equally. A beneficial owner of 25 percent or more must be disclosed to the company within one month (OR art. 697j), and Swiss banks apply real substance and know-your-customer scrutiny when opening the capital and operating accounts, so a credible local footprint helps. None of this favours one form over the other; the resident-representative rule is the single foreigner-specific requirement, and it is identical for the AG and the GmbH.

Switching

Converting a GmbH into an AG later.

The choice is not permanent. The Swiss Merger Act allows a GmbH to be transformed into an AG (FusG art. 53 ff) without liquidating the company or interrupting its legal identity, and the conversion is generally tax-neutral provided the tax-subject identity is maintained. Book values carry over. Many founders deliberately start as a GmbH to keep the capital outlay at CHF 20,000, then convert to an AG once revenue, banking needs or an incoming investor justify the larger structure.

The conversion is a notarised process that raises the capital to the AG minimum, restates the articles and re-registers the entity. It is routine but not free, so if you already know an AG is where you will end up, it is usually cheaper to start there. For the steps and the typical timeline either way, see our formation process and timeline.

Decision

Which should you choose.

Reduced to the questions that actually decide it:

  • Choose a GmbH if the CHF 100,000 capital is a constraint, the business is small, closely held or owner-managed, or it is a local subsidiary of a foreign group, and public ownership is acceptable. You can set up a Swiss GmbH at CHF 20,000 fully paid and convert later.
  • Choose an AG if you need owner anonymity, plan to raise venture or institutional capital, want shares that transfer freely, or want the strongest signal to Swiss banks and large counterparties. You can register a Swiss AG at the CHF 100,000 minimum.

If you are raising outside capital or building an investment or asset-holding structure, the AG also sits naturally under a Swiss holding company. And if you are still weighing whether to form a Swiss entity at all or operate through a foreign parent, compare the routes in our guide to a branch versus subsidiary in Switzerland. For most foreign founders building a standalone Swiss business, the practical default is a GmbH for cost-sensitive starts and an AG wherever privacy, prestige or outside capital is in play. Either way, our company formation in Switzerland team handles the registration end to end.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between an AG and a GmbH in Switzerland?

Both are limited-liability corporations taxed identically. The AG needs CHF 100,000 capital, keeps shareholders private and transfers shares freely; the GmbH needs CHF 20,000, lists quotaholders publicly in the Commercial Register, and transfers quotas with more formality.

What does GmbH stand for?

GmbH stands for Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung, a limited liability company (Sàrl in French), governed by Swiss Code of Obligations art. 772 ff.

What does AG stand for?

AG stands for Aktiengesellschaft, a stock corporation or company limited by shares (SA in French), governed by Swiss Code of Obligations art. 620 ff.

How much capital do I need, AG vs GmbH?

An AG requires CHF 100,000, with at least CHF 50,000 or 20% paid in at formation (OR art. 621, 632). A GmbH requires CHF 20,000, fully paid in at formation (OR art. 773, 777c).

Are GmbH shareholders publicly visible?

Yes. GmbH quotaholders’ names, domiciles and quota values are listed in the Commercial Register / Zefix, and every transfer is published. AG shareholders sit in a private share register that is not published.

Can a GmbH be converted into an AG later?

Yes, under the Merger Act (FusG art. 53 ff). Legal identity and book values are preserved, and the conversion is generally tax-neutral if tax-subject identity is maintained.

Do AG and GmbH pay the same tax?

Yes. Both are taxed as corporations on the same federal (8.5% statutory, 7.83% effective) plus cantonal and communal basis. The combined effective rate varies by canton, not by legal form.

Can a foreigner fully own a Swiss AG or GmbH?

Yes, 100% foreign ownership is allowed for both forms. The only binding constraint is that at least one representative must be resident in Switzerland (OR art. 718.4 for the AG, 814.3 for the GmbH).

Which is better for a startup raising investment?

Usually the AG, because shares transfer freely, shareholders stay anonymous, and investors recognise the form.

Is an AG more prestigious than a GmbH?

The AG carries higher international recognition, while the GmbH is simpler and lower-capital for owner-run SMEs.

What is the minimum nominal value of a share or quota?

Since the 2023 reform a share’s minimum nominal value is CHF 0.01 (OR art. 622.4); a GmbH quota’s minimum nominal value is CHF 100 (OR art. 774).

Do both forms need an auditor?

Both follow the same regime: an ordinary audit applies above the OR art. 727 thresholds (balance sheet CHF 20m, revenue CHF 40m, 250 FTE; 2 of 3 over 2 years), a limited review below, with an opt-out at 10 or fewer full-time employees.

Turn this into a Swiss plan that works.

A 30-minute call to map your structure, canton, timeline and required substance. No price-list. Every engagement is scoped on the call.